Selection from the list of topics

What do the numbers stand for?
What is the purpose of the standard error?
When are two results statistically different?
When is it not sufficient to consider only the standard error?
Two types of changes?
Change analyses: When are the results (not) additive?
Why is a dot (“.”) sometimes given in the cells for standard error or estimated value?
Why are no standard error values shown in some tables?
Negative values for growing stock, increment or fellings?

1. What do the numbers stand for?

The tables mainly show results that were calculated using statistical methods from the data of the sample inventory of the National Forest Inventory (NFI). Such results always consist of two figures: (1) the estimated value and (2) the sampling error, the so-called standard error.

Example 1: Estimated value and standard error

NFI5

volume of deadwood (stemwood)
ownership (2 categories)

regional demarcation: production region

unit: m³/ha

evaluation area: accessible forest without shrub forest

grid: 1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5

state 2018/26
	production region
	Jura		Plateau		Pre-Alps		Alps		Southern Alps		Switzerland
ownership (2 categories)	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%
public	30	10	17	13	37	9	36	6	26	10	30	4
private	27	17	20	12	50	10	32	8	39	13	34	5
total	29estimated value	9standard error	19	9	44	7	35	5	29	8	32	3

The tables usually show the relative (percentage) standard error (“±%”), but occasionally – in the case of estimated percentages – the absolute standard error (“±”).

top

2. What is the purpose of the standard error?

The standard error can be used to define confidence intervals around the estimated value, which contain the true value of the population with a certain statistical certainty.

The statistical certainty is:

68% if the confidence interval is calculated using the standard error
(68% confidence interval = estimated value ± standard error), and
95% if the confidence interval is calculated using twice the standard error
(95% confidence interval = estimated value ± 2 × standard error*)

Example 2: Calculating confidence intervals

LFI5
volume of deadwood (stemwood)
ownership (2 categories)
regional demarcation: production region
unit: m³/ha
evaluation area: accessible forest without shrub forest
grid: 1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
state 2018/26
	production region
	Jura
ownership (2 classes)	m³/ha	±%
public	30	10
private	27	17
total	29	9

Question
What are the 68% and 95% confidence intervals of the above estimates?

Procedure

Calculate the absolute standard error (= relative standard error × estimated value / 100)
Calculate the confidence intervals
- 68% confidence interval = estimated value ± absolute standard error
- 95% confidence interval = estimated value ± 2 × absolute standard error

Answer

			Step 1	Step 2

ownership (2 categories)	volume of deadwood Jura NFI5
	estimated value	standard error		confidence interval
		relative	absolute	68%	95%
	m³/ha	±%	±m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha
public	30	10	3	27-33	24-36
private	27	17	5	22-32	17-37
total	29	9	3	26-32calculated with the standard error, i.e. 29 ± 3	23-25calculated with twice the standard error, i.e. 29 ± 2 × 3

The volume of deadwood in the Jura is between 26 and 32 m³/ha with a statistical certainty of 68% and between 23 and 35 m³/ha with a statistical certainty of 95%.

The 95% confidence interval is larger than the 68% confidence interval. This results in higher statistical certainty with the 95% confidence interval.

Example 3: Visualisation of the 68% and 95% confidence intervals

Data: see example 2

When interpreting the results, one must define the level of statistical certainty that one would like to apply to the statement.

The 68% confidence interval is generally used in the National Forest Inventory (NFI).

top

3. When are two results statistically different?*

This can be checked by comparing the confidence intervals of two estimated values:

If the 68% confidence intervals of two estimates do not overlap, it can be assumed with some certainty that the two populations differ.
If the 95% confidence intervals of two estimates do not overlap, it can be assumed with high certainty that the two populations differ.

Example 4: Interpretation of two results from the same inventory

NFI5
growing stock (stemwood)
ownership (2 categories)
regional demarcation: production region
unit: m³/ha
evaluation area: accessible forest without shrub forest
grid: 1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
state 2018/26
	production region
	Jura		Plateau		Pre-Alps		Alps		Southern Alps		Switzerland
ownership (2 categories)	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%
public	331	3	311	3	405	4	300	3	256	5	314	2
private	387	5	432	4	454	4	348	4	285	6	398	2
total	345	2	363	2	431	2	314	2	262	4	343	1

	case 2						case 1

case 1

Question
Is the growing stock per hectare greater in the Alps than in the Southern Alps?

Procedure

Calculate the absolute standard errors
Calculate the confidence intervals depending on the desired level of statistical certainty:
- 68% confidence intervals (some certainty; absolute standard error)
- 95% confidence intervals (high certainty; twice the absolute standard error)
Assess whether the confidence intervals corresponding to the desired level of statistical certainty do not overlap

Answer

ownership (2 categories)	growing stock NFI5
	Alps					Southern Alps
	estimated value	standard error		confidence interval		estimated value	standard error		confidence interval
		relative	absolute	68%	95%		relative	absolute	68%	95%
	m³/ha	±%	±m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha	±%	±m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha
total	314	2	6	308-320	302-326	262	4	10	252-272	242-282

Neither the 68%-confidence intervals nor the 95%-confidence intervals overlap (pairs of values in ).

In this case, the level of statistical certainty selected has no influence on the result.

Overall, this means that there is high statistical certainty that the growing stock per hectare is greater in the Alps than in the Southern Alps.

Case 2

Question
Is the growing stock per hectare greater in the Plateau than in the Jura?

Procedure

See case 1.

Answer

ownership (2 categories)	growing stock NFI5
	Jura					Plateau
	estimated value	standard error		confidence interval		estimated value	standard error		confidence interval
		relative	absolute	68%	95%		relative	absolute	68%	95%
	m³/ha	±%	±m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha	±%	±m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha
total	345	2	7	338-352	331-359	363	2	7	356-370	349-377

The 68%-confidence intervals do not overlap (pairs of values in ).
In contrast, the 95%-confidence intervals overlap (pairs of values in ).

In this case, the level of statistical certainty selected has an influence on the interpretation of the results. At the 68% confidence interval level, the conclusion is that the growing stock per hectare is higher in the Plateau than in the Jura. At the 95% confidence interval level, however, this conclusion cannot be drawn.

Considering both confidence interval levels, it can be said that there is some, but not high, statistical certainty that the growing stock per hectare is greater in the Plateau than in the Jura.

The confidence intervals can also be used to determine whether a value estimated with a sample from the National Forest Inventory (NFI) deviates from a target value (e.g. from Swiss forest policy) or whether a change between two inventories is statistically certain.

Example 5: Interpretation of two results from different inventories

ownership (2 categories)	growing stock Plateau*
	NFI4		NFI5
	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%
public	340	3	309	3
private	447	4	432	4
total	386	2	363	2
* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5

Question
Has the growing stock per hectare in the Plateau decreased from NFI4 to NFI5?

Procedure

Calculate the absolute standard errors
Calculate the confidence intervals depending on the desired level of statistical certainty:
- 68% confidence intervals (some certainty; absolute standard error)
- 95% confidence intervals (high certainty; twice the absolute standard error)
Assess whether the confidence intervals corresponding to the desired level of statistical certainty do not overlap.

Answer

ownership (2 categories)	growing stock Plateau*
	NFI4					NFI5
	estimated value	standard error		confidence interval		estimated value	standard error		confidence interval
		relative	absolute	68%	95%		relative	absolute	68%	95%
	m³/ha	±%	±	m³/ha	m³/ha	m³/ha	±%	±	m³/ha	m³/ha
public	340	3	11	329-351	318-362	309	3	11	298-320	287-331
private	447	4	16	431-463	415-479	432	4	17	415-449	398-466
total	386	2	8	378-394	370-402	363	2	9	354-372	345-381
* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5

The 68%-confidence intervals do not overlap in the public forest (pairs of values in ), but they do in the private forest and the total forest (pairs of values in ). At the certainty level of the 68% confidence intervals, it can be concluded that the growing stock per hectare in the public forest of the Plateau has decreased. For the private forest, as well as for the total forest, the decrease is not statistically certain at this level.

The 95%-confidence intervals overlap in all three categories. At the certainty level of the 95% confidence intervals, it is therefore not certain that the growing stock has decreased, even for the public forest.

See also examples 6 and 7, in which changes between two inventories are interpreted using the more sensitive metric of net change.

For many target variables in the NFI, it is possible to determine whether a change between two inventories is statistically certain, not only by comparing the states in the two inventories (see example 5), but also by analysing the net change** between the two inventories.

To do this, one must first define the level of statistical certainty that one would like to apply to the statement (as done above):

A net change has occurred with some certainty if the relative standard error is less than 100% or if the confidence interval calculated with the absolute standard error (68% confidence interval) does not include the value 0.
A net change has occurred with high certainty if twice the relative standard error is less than 100% or if the confidence interval calculated with twice the absolute standard error (95% confidence interval) does not include the value 0.

Example 6: Interpretation of net changes with the relative standard error

ownership (2 categories)	change in growing stock from NFI4 to NFI5, Plateau*
	estimated value	standard error
	m³/ha	±%
public	-34	30
private	-9	147
total	-23	34
* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5

Question
Has the growing stock per hectare in the Plateau decreased from NFI4 to NFI5?

Procedure

Define the level of statistical certainty (68% or 95% confidence interval)
Determine whether:
- the relative standard error is less than 100% (certainty level of the 68% confidence interval)
- twice the relative standard error is less than 100% (certainty level of the 95% confidence interval)

Answer

ownership (2 categories)	change in growing stock from NFI4 to NFI5, Plateau*
	estimated value	standard error
		single	double
	m³/ha	±%	±%
public	-34	30	60
private	-9	147	294
total	-23	34	68
* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5

The single relative standard error is less than 100% for both the public forest and the total forest (highlighted values). For the private forest, however, it is greater than 100% (highlighted values). At the certainty level of the 68% confidence interval, it can be concluded that the growing stock in the Plateau has decreased in the public forest and in total. For the private forest, on the other hand, the decrease in stock is not statistically certain at this level.

The same conclusion is reached in this example with the certainty level of the 95% confidence interval, as twice the relative standard error is again less than 100% for both the public forest and the total forest.

Overall, this means that there is high statistical certainty that the growing stock per hectare has decreased in the public forest in the Plateau, as well as overall. For private forests, on the other hand, the decrease in stock is not statistically certain (as twice the relative standard error and the relative standard error are both less than 100%).

Example 7: Interpretation of net changes with the absolute standard error

ownership (2 categories)	change in growing stock from NFI4 to NFI5, Plateau*
	estimated value	standard error
	%	±
public	-10	3
private	-2	3
total	-6	2
* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5

Question
Has the growing stock per hectare in the Plateau decreased from NFI4 to NFI5?

Procedure

Define the level of statistical certainty (68% or 95% confidence interval)
Calculate the confidence interval based on the defined certainty level
- 68% confidence interval with the absolute standard error
- 95% confidence interval with twice the absolute standard error
Determine whether the corresponding confidence interval does not include the value 0

Answer

ownership (2 categories)	change in growing stock from NFI4 to NFI5, Plateau*
	estimated value	standard error		confidence interval
		single	double	68%	95%
	%	±	±	%	%
public	-10	3	6	-13 to -7	-16 to -4
private	-2	3	6	-5 to +1	-8 to +4
total	-6	2	4	-8 to -4	-10 to -2
* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5

Neither the 68% nor the 95% confidence interval includes the value 0 for the public forest or for the total forest. At both certainty levels, this leads to the conclusion that the growing stock in the Plateau has decreased in the public forest and in total. For the private forest, on the other hand, the decrease in stock is not statistically certain (as the confidence intervals include the value 0).

Net changes can be interpreted using the absolute or relative standard error (see examples 6 and 7). It is advisable to use the absolute standard error if the estimated value in the table is shown as a percentage (%; as in example 7), and the relative standard error if the estimated value in the table is shown in absolute terms (m³, m³/ha, pc, m²; as in example 6). This means that the standard error can be taken directly from the table and does not need to be converted.

To assess whether a change is statistically certain, it is advisable to analyse the net change between the two inventories wherever possible. Net changes are more sensitive than status comparisons, which makes it easier to detect differences statistically. See examples 6 and 7 (net change) and 7 (comparison of two results from different inventories).

top

4. When is it not sufficient to consider only the standard error?

The National Forest Inventory (NFI) is a sample-based large-scale inventory whose sample areas are arranged on a grid with a mesh size of 1.4 km × 1.4 km. The NFI was designed in such a way that the growing stock for Switzerland as a whole can be predicted with a maximum standard error of 1%.

If results are requested for individual regions or for individual classes, the standard error quickly becomes much larger. This is because the number of sample areas and subjects (e.g. sample trees, young forest plants, pieces of deadwood) analysed for the queried combination of variable expressions* is considerably lower than for the total.

Example 8: Standard error and combination of variable expressions

region	growing stock
	total		maple		sycamore		Norway maple
	estimated value	standard error	estimated value	standard error	estimated value	standard error	estimated value	standard error
	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%	m³/ha	±%
Switzerland	343	1	12	5	11	5	1	20
production region "Plateau"	363	2	15	10	14	11	0	50
Canton of Aargau	289	7	15	20	13	20	1	63

The standard error increases as the level of detail increases.

Large standard errors are to be expected if:

forest districts are selected as the regional demarcation or results for small cantons (e.g. Appenzell Innerrhoden, Nidwalden) are queried,
a classification variable with many classes is selected (e.g. tree species in 56 classes),
several classification variables are combined with each other (e.g. main tree species and development stage).

Large standard errors are an indication that the estimate may have been based on too small a number of sample areas or subjects and that the result of the estimate therefore may not be reliable.

For the target variable “number of stems of young forest plants with browsing damage” (browsing intensity), an uncertain estimate is not necessarily recognisable by a large standard error. This is because this target variable is a quotient estimator**, which is – due to the survey method – only based on a small number of assessed young forest plants for rarer tree species (e.g. pine, larch, Arolla pine, oak, chestnut). Accordingly, for this target variable one should always check how many young forest plants were assessed for the individual estimates. As a rule of thumb, at least 30 young forest plants per estimate should have been assessed for browsing in order to obtain a reliable estimate.

top

5. Two types of changes?

There are two types of changes in the National Forest Inventory (NFI):

The first type of change involves specific target variables for change components such as increment, fellings or mortality. These target variables are only available for two consecutive measurement cycles, e.g. NFI4 to NFI5. When change components are analysed, the classification variable expression of the second measurement cycle is generally assigned to the first measurement cycle. These analyses therefore do not take into account any change in the expression (e.g. from private to public ownership) from the earlier to the later measurement cycle.
In the second type of change, the difference in target variables, such as stem number, growing stock or forest area, is used to calculate the net change between two measurement cycles. These target variables are usually used to represent states, e.g. that in NFI5, but can also show the net change between any two measurement cycles, e.g. between NFI1 and NFI5. In these net change analyses, the change in expression is taken into account for some of the classification variables, including “tree condition” and “forest, non-forest”. In this way, it can be seen, for example, that the forest area has increased. For the remaining classification variables, the expressions are regarded as static. This means that the most recent state – whether it was assessed in a measurement cycle (e.g. “primary forest function NFI5”) or taken from an external data source (e.g. “protection forest [2022]”) – is assigned to all measurement cycles.

top

6. Change analyses: When are the results (not) additive?

The results are:

additive if they are reported as the total change between two measurement dates. For example, the fellings for the various production regions reported in cubic metres (m³) can be added together to obtain the total fellings for Switzerland.
not additive if they are reported as a change per year (e.g. m³/year). For example, the fellings for the various production regions reported in cubic metres per year (m³/year) cannot be added together to obtain the total fellings for Switzerland.

Example 9: : Additivity/non-additivity of changes

	growing stock: total change between NFI4 and NFI5 (in 1000 m³)*
	Jura		Plateau		Pre-Alps		Alps		Southern Alps		Switzerland
higher/lower altitude zone	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%	1000 m³	±%
lower altitude zone	-3759.0	28	-4909.1	36	-1025.2	133	-317.1	195	3464.1	31	-6546.3	42
higher altitude zone	574.3	117	-328.0	62	1093.0	123	7128.4	21	666.7	93	9134.3	24
total	-3184.7	40	-5237.1	34	67.9	2805	6811.3	23	4130.8	30	2588.1	136
	* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5
	additive

	growing stock: annual change between NFI4 and NFI5 (in 1000 m³/year)*
	Jura		Plateau		Pre-Alps		Alps		Southern Alps		Switzerland
higher/lower altitude zone	1000 m³/year	±%	1000 m³/year	±%	1000 m³/year	±%	1000 m³/year	±%	1000 m³/year	±%	1000 m³/year	±%
lower altitude zone	-421.1	28	-560.6	36	-115.7	133	-35.9	195	389.5	31	-740.7	42
higher altitude zone	64.7	117	-38.3	62	122.4	123	810.4	21	74.9	93	1032.7	24
total	-357.3	40	-598.4	34	7.6	2805	773.8	23	464.4	30	292.7	136
	* accessible forest without shrub forest NFI4/NFI5
	not additive

The non-additivity of changes expressed per year arises because the total change is divided by the average number of years between the two measurement dates in the domain* under consideration, and this average number of years varies slightly depending on the domain.

Example 10: Average number of years per domain

domain		mean number of years*
production region	higher/lower altitude zone
Mittelland	-	8.75
Plateau	higher altitude zone	8.56
Plateau	lower altitude zone	8.76
Southern Alps	-	8.90
Southern Alps	higher altitude zone	8.90
Southern Alps	lower altitude zone	8.89
* between the NFI4 and NFI5 measurements in the accessible forest without shrub forest

top

7. Why is a dot (“.”) sometimes given in the cells for standard error or estimated value?

In the calculation of a results table, data is not always available for all combinations of variable expressions*. In most cases, this indicates that the variable estimated with the relevant target variable does not occur or only occurs very rarely. The value 0 is then usually used. However, as this value is not based on any direct measurements, a dot (“.”) is given for the associated standard error. If reference is made to the assumed value of 0 in the calculation, e.g. in the case of percentages or certain change estimates, no value can be used. In this case, a dot (“.”) is given for the estimated value and the standard error.

For example, no Arolla pines have yet been found and measured in the Plateau in the National Forest Inventory (NFI) (growing stock of Arolla pine by production region). It can therefore be assumed that the values are missing because the Arolla pine actually does not occur in the Plateau, and therefore the growing stock in that region must be 0.

top

8. Why are no standard error values shown in some tables?

The data in these tables originates from a complete survey and not from a sample inventory. Accordingly, it is not necessary to specify a standard error because there is no uncertainty due to sampling.

The forest road network survey that the National Forest Inventory (NFI) periodically carries out with the local forestry services is an example of such a complete survey.

top

9. Negative values for growing stock, increment or fellings?

A negative value is possible if the result could only be calculated on the basis of a few trees. The estimate is therefore not reliable. This is also reflected in the standard error, which is usually extremely large for negative stock, increment or felling values.

Negative values can occur because, when the stemwood volume of the tally trees is determined, the volume estimated solely on the basis of the diameter at breast height (DBH) (tariff volume) is adjusted using the volume of the tally trees estimated on the basis of DBH, diameter at 7 m height and tree height. This procedure enables an unbiased and more accurate calculation of the stemwood volume. However, it can lead to negative values for all target variables that are based on the stemwood volume of the tally trees (e.g. growing stock, increment, fellings) if the number of tally trees in the selected combination of variable expressions* is small.

top

NFI1
number of stems
diameter at breast height (10 classes) · main tree species
regional demarcation: production region
unit: 1000 n
evaluation area: accessible forest without shrub forest NFI1-NFI5
grid: 1.4 km grid, subgrids 1-5
state 1983/85
		production region
		Jura		Plateau		Pre-Alps		Alps		Southern Alps		Switzerland
diameter at breast height (10 classes)	main tree species	1000 n	±%	1000 n	±%	1000 n	±%	1000 n	±%	1000 n	±%	1000 n	±%
n/a	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	spruce	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	fir	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	larch	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	Arolla pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	other conifers	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	beech	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	maple	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	ash	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	oak	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	sweet chestnut	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	other broadleaves	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	indeterminable	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
12-20 cm	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	spruce	9696	14	13499	11	19075	9	25954	6	2727	15	70950	4
	fir	6721	10	5334	13	6559	9	2722	15	539	38	21875	6
	pine	693	39	618	44	423	72	6106	16	67	78	7906	14
	larch	69	61	174	47	0	.	3249	14	1644	21	5136	11
	Arolla pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	1197	20	0	.	1197	20
	other conifers	435	48	459	37	96	45	300	41	0	.	1291	23
	beech	13395	8	10656	7	9025	10	5956	13	6497	16	45529	4
	maple	2561	13	1777	16	2316	13	2342	17	282	32	9280	7
	ash	1813	21	2610	14	3087	18	1760	23	867	28	10137	9
	oak	1313	35	2076	30	259	41	602	29	1291	38	5541	17
	sweet chestnut	0	.	0	.	0	.	93	72	8139	15	8232	15
	other broadleaves	3059	16	4411	15	4098	16	6329	12	8825	11	26722	6
	indeterminable	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	39755	5	41615	5	44938	5	56610	4	30878	6	213796	2
21-30 cm	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	spruce	5206	10	7839	9	13630	8	19429	6	2520	17	48625	4
	fir	4295	11	3712	12	4196	10	1550	17	166	48	13919	6
	pine	797	28	520	28	152	63	3429	14	119	54	5017	11
	larch	52	58	259	42	0	.	2941	13	1127	22	4379	11
	Arolla pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	1003	20	0	.	1003	20
	other conifers	35	71	117	43	0	.	15	100	0	.	167	35
	beech	9199	7	6511	8	5457	10	3156	12	2648	16	26971	4
	maple	1589	13	1408	16	1451	14	1427	16	56	58	5931	7
	ash	1279	18	1877	14	1361	18	874	25	57	57	5447	9
	oak	878	22	1317	15	95	64	133	50	470	34	2893	11
	sweet chestnut	0	.	0	.	0	.	34	71	2643	18	2677	18
	other broadleaves	1067	18	1766	16	741	23	1087	21	2360	16	7022	8
	indeterminable	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	24396	4	25327	4	27083	5	35079	4	12167	7	124051	2
31-40 cm	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	spruce	3964	9	7538	7	9506	7	12782	6	1606	16	35396	3
	fir	2802	10	2763	10	2915	10	1022	16	177	35	9679	5
	pine	938	19	1221	18	87	43	1428	15	111	67	3784	10
	larch	24	77	231	30	0	.	2409	11	724	22	3388	9
	Arolla pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	664	21	0	.	664	21
	other conifers	0	.	100	50	0	.	17	100	0	.	117	45
	beech	4879	7	3811	9	3132	11	1266	14	753	18	13842	5
	maple	688	16	326	24	622	21	355	23	26	77	2017	10
	ash	417	23	1122	14	351	23	244	30	41	84	2175	10
	oak	378	24	621	18	21	74	45	61	255	37	1321	13
	sweet chestnut	0	.	0	.	0	.	48	63	565	21	613	20
	other broadleaves	515	21	549	20	115	34	516	22	511	26	2207	11
	indeterminable	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	14605	4	18282	4	16751	5	20797	4	4770	8	75204	2
41-50 cm	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	spruce	2881	8	4564	7	5786	6	7537	5	1061	14	21829	3
	fir	1208	11	1619	11	2004	9	703	15	196	31	5730	5
	pine	384	19	916	16	194	47	612	19	7	100	2113	10
	larch	28	61	118	32	22	75	1552	10	447	16	2166	8
	Arolla pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	240	24	0	.	240	24
	other conifers	0	.	129	54	0	.	0	.	0	.	129	54
	beech	2061	9	1940	9	1270	13	716	15	310	21	6298	5
	maple	145	23	136	29	119	30	137	24	0	.	537	13
	ash	153	25	345	18	131	29	55	42	18	72	701	12
	oak	132	27	375	21	0	.	26	63	38	51	571	16
	sweet chestnut	0	.	0	.	0	.	14	71	310	22	323	22
	other broadleaves	71	48	128	29	36	45	123	28	58	47	416	17
	indeterminable	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	7063	5	10270	4	9562	4	11713	4	2446	8	41054	2
51-60 cm	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	spruce	1261	11	1878	9	2616	8	3456	6	537	16	9747	4
	fir	424	17	593	14	793	13	418	18	30	49	2258	8
	pine	91	33	225	23	35	76	193	28	14	71	558	15
	larch	14	71	48	38	23	58	950	12	265	21	1299	10
	Arolla pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	100	30	0	.	100	30
	other conifers	0	.	22	73	0	.	0	.	0	.	22	73
	beech	606	14	634	13	544	19	287	21	152	30	2223	8
	maple	42	57	50	38	24	61	21	58	0	.	137	26
	ash	22	58	132	25	22	57	20	73	0	.	196	21
	oak	77	37	157	24	0	.	0	.	8	100	242	20
	sweet chestnut	0	.	0	.	0	.	7	100	116	28	123	27
	other broadleaves	29	50	61	43	7	100	68	42	23	57	188	23
	indeterminable	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	2565	7	3800	6	4065	6	5519	5	1144	10	17093	3
61-70 cm	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	spruce	280	18	486	14	761	12	1022	11	240	26	2790	6
	fir	144	22	127	23	285	20	45	42	24	58	624	12
	pine	21	75	41	47	18	72	28	50	0	.	108	29
	larch	0	.	14	71	17	72	370	17	85	35	485	15
	Arolla pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	36	53	0	.	36	53
	other conifers	0	.	7	100	7	100	0	.	0	.	14	71
	beech	126	28	260	21	80	34	87	31	52	38	606	13
	maple	29	50	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	29	50
	ash	21	75	21	58	7	100	0	.	0	.	49	43
	oak	9	100	27	50	12	100	0	.	0	.	48	42
	sweet chestnut	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	53	43	53	43
	other broadleaves	0	.	8	100	10	100	14	71	7	100	38	45
	indeterminable	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	630	12	990	10	1198	10	1602	9	460	16	4879	5
71-80 cm	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	spruce	104	30	123	25	275	23	378	15	91	38	971	10
	fir	88	31	66	37	127	26	42	48	30	60	352	16
	pine	0	.	7	100	0	.	7	100	0	.	14	71
	larch	7	100	7	100	0	.	169	25	36	45	219	21
	Arolla pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	50	43	0	.	50	43
	other conifers	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	beech	8	100	52	38	24	58	16	71	7	100	107	27
	maple	0	.	0	.	6	100	17	73	0	.	23	60
	ash	0	.	24	59	0	.	0	.	0	.	24	59
	oak	0	.	54	38	0	.	6	100	0	.	60	36
	sweet chestnut	0	.	0	.	0	.	7	100	93	50	100	47
	other broadleaves	0	.	8	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	8	100
	indeterminable	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	207	21	340	15	432	17	691	11	257	24	1927	7
81-90 cm	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	spruce	21	58	37	45	37	45	108	26	14	71	217	18
	fir	7	100	0	.	54	38	14	71	18	72	93	29
	pine	0	.	8	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	8	100
	larch	0	.	0	.	0	.	36	45	0	.	36	45
	Arolla pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	7	100	0	.	7	100
	other conifers	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	beech	8	100	36	45	0	.	20	58	0	.	63	33
	maple	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	ash	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	oak	7	100	29	50	0	.	0	.	0	.	36	45
	sweet chestnut	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	33	50	33	50
	other broadleaves	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	indeterminable	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	43	41	110	29	91	29	184	19	65	36	493	13
91-100 cm	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	spruce	15	71	14	71	13	71	52	38	0	.	93	28
	fir	14	70	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	14	70
	pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	larch	0	.	0	.	0	.	14	71	7	100	21	58
	Arolla pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	7	100	0	.	7	100
	other conifers	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	beech	0	.	14	71	0	.	0	.	0	.	14	71
	maple	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	ash	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	oak	0	.	7	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	7	100
	sweet chestnut	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	35	51	35	51
	other broadleaves	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	indeterminable	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	28	50	35	45	13	71	73	32	42	46	191	20
>100 cm	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	spruce	0	.	0	.	9	100	7	100	7	100	24	58
	fir	7	100	0	.	0	.	0	.	11	100	18	73
	pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	larch	0	.	0	.	0	.	7	100	7	100	14	71
	Arolla pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	14	71	0	.	14	71
	other conifers	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	beech	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	maple	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	ash	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	oak	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	sweet chestnut	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	52	49	52	49
	other broadleaves	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	indeterminable	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	7	100	0	.	9	100	29	50	78	38	122	28
total	n/a	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	spruce	23429	8	35978	6	51708	5	70724	4	8805	12	190643	3
	fir	15709	8	14215	9	16933	7	6516	12	1189	28	54562	4
	pine	2922	16	3556	14	909	50	11803	12	317	52	19508	9
	larch	194	33	850	24	62	45	11697	8	4342	14	17144	7
	Arolla pine	0	.	0	.	0	.	3318	15	0	.	3318	15
	other conifers	470	48	834	28	103	42	333	39	0	.	1740	20
	beech	30282	5	23916	5	19533	8	11504	10	10419	14	95653	3
	maple	5053	10	3698	12	4539	10	4298	13	365	32	17953	6
	ash	3704	15	6130	10	4959	15	2952	20	983	25	18728	7
	oak	2794	22	4663	16	388	34	812	28	2063	27	10720	11
	sweet chestnut	0	.	0	.	0	.	203	54	12039	13	12242	13
	other broadleaves	4742	13	6931	12	5007	15	8137	11	11785	10	36602	5
	indeterminable	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.	0	.
	total	89299	3	100769	3	104141	3	132296	3	52308	5	478813	1

Table citation

Abegg, M.; Ahles, P.; Allgaier Leuch, B.; Cioldi, F.; Didion, M.; Düggelin, C.; Fischer, C.; Herold, A.; Meile, R.; Rohner, B.; Rösler, E.; Speich, S.; Temperli, C.; Traub, B.,
2023: Swiss national forest inventory - Result table No. 1326944. Birmensdorf, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL

zurück